Sen. Johnson: No COVID-19 Vaccine Because High Levels of Antibodies – The Epoch Times

Transmission electron micrograph of SARS-CoV-2, or CCP infection particles, isolated from a patient. Its normal for antibody levels to go down after severe infection, but they dont go down to absolutely no; they plateau. These cells will live and produce antibodies for the rest of peoples lives. Thats strong proof for lasting immunity.”.
” For some reason now the FDA has come out with an assistance or report saying that if you have antibodies, thats no evidence of immunity.

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) is not getting a COVID-19 vaccine for now since he still has high levels of antibodies against the infection that triggers the illness.
Johnson and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) both contracted COVID-19, which is triggered by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, in 2015.
” In my case, I just recently had an antibody test and I have the exact same level of antibodies as the doctor who recommended me the test who had simply gotten 2 doses of Moderna,” Johnson informed Epoch TVs “American Thought Leaders.”
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) this month recommended versus utilizing antibody testing to figure out resistance from the CCP virus.
” Antibody tests can play an important function in identifying individuals who may have been exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and might have developed an adaptive immune reaction. Antibody tests should not be used at this time to determine immunity or protection against COVID-19 at any time, and particularly after a person has actually received a COVID-19 vaccination,” Tim Stenzel, director of the Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health in the FDAs Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in a declaration announcing the brand-new guidance.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends people who recovered from COVID-19 get a vaccine.
” Thats due to the fact that specialists do not yet know how long you are protected from getting sick again after recuperating from COVID-19,” the agency states.
A growing body of research, however, suggests that those who had COVID-19 and recovered maintain immunity for months, if not years.
Transmission electron micrograph of SARS-CoV-2, or CCP virus particles, isolated from a client. Image captured and color-enhanced at the NIAID Integrated Research Facility (IRF) in Fort Detrick, Maryland. (NIAID).
Researchers funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), for example, found that individuals who recuperated established a strong resistance versus the disease for up to eight months after infection. Missouri researchers just recently found individuals retained immune cells producing antibodies for months after recovery.
” Last fall, there were reports that antibodies subside quickly after infection with the virus that triggers COVID-19, and mainstream media analyzed that to suggest that immunity was not long-lived,” senior author Ali Ellebedy, an associate teacher of pathology & & immunology, of medicine and of molecular microbiology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, stated in a declaration.
” But thats a misinterpretation of the data. Its typical for antibody levels to go down after acute infection, however they dont go down to zero; they plateau. Here, we discovered antibody-producing cells in people 11 months after first symptoms. These cells will live and produce antibodies for the rest of peoples lives. Thats strong evidence for lasting immunity.”.
Johnson regreted what he views as official assistance from the federal government that does not associate the science on the concern.
” For some reason now the FDA has come out with an assistance or report saying that if you have antibodies, thats no evidence of immunity. Why is the FDA CDC, and NIHs default position on those people that have been previously infected, that possibilities are you most likely dont have resistance? Why would they say that? Its just not real,” he said.
” Almost every other infection that we know that once youve had the disease, youre immune from it, and definitely if you have an active case of the disease you sure do not wish to get the vaccine, and yet we have this big push to vaccinate everybody, despite medical requirement or prospective harm that may come of possibly immunizing someone whos been formerly contaminated or currently having a case of COVID,” he included.
Paul has actually offered a comparable view, stating he will not get a vaccine till he sees “proof that people who have currently had the infection are dying in large numbers, or being hospitalized or getting really sick.”.
Johnson pointed to a current research study from Israel. Scientist there found that defense against infection, hospitalization, serious health problem, and death were similar in percentage between those who got a COVID-19 vaccine and those who had COVID-19 and recovered.
” Our results question the requirement to immunize previously-infected specific [s],” they wrote.
” Theres a study simply published out of Israel that reveals that those people that were previously contaminated have as excellent if not much better immunity than the vaccine, and that would make a great deal of sense,” Johnson said.
” The vaccine is actually designed based on the spike proteins to recognize those; when youve had the disease your immune system determines the entire coronavirus, which is why people with the SARS 1 17 years later seem immune to SARS 2 although SARS 2 is just 80 percent genetically similar to SARS 1. So, the sound judgment, just basic medication, would show that if youve currently been contaminated with the virus, your immune system is going to be pretty efficient in warding off a reinfection.”.