Al Drago/Getty ImagesSenate Democratic leaders are advising their caucus to stick together and fend off GOP changes that might modify key components of the $1.9 trillion relief plan when it heads to the flooring later on this week, a plea targeted at keeping together a vulnerable Democratic coalition in order to send the bill to President Bidens desk by mid-March. Senators are strolling into a legal minefield later today since the relief costs is being considered under budget plan reconciliation guidelines that enable a free-flowing amendment procedure, suggesting senators can force votes on as many amendments as they like. That means if 2 Democrats break ranks, they could change the costs with the support of 49 Republicans.But Democratic leaders want their caucus to hold the line against amendments that could change the core of the costs and eventually thwart the chances of getting the sweeping step out of both chambers by March 14– when out of work advantages are set to expire for countless Americans.Asked if he desired his caucus to hold the line against GOP modifications, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin told CNN: “Certainly [against] any changes that we think will be disruptive of the reconciliation procedure– maybe more.” Durbin added of the GOP changes: “There are some that might be lethal. We have to take it very seriously.” Its unclear which amendments might peel away Democratic support, however celebration leaders and the White House have their eyes in specific on a handful of their more centrist members, consisting of Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Angus King of Maine.Whether there might be some changes around the margins of the costs stay to be seen. And already the Senate is poised to make one major change: Scrapping the $15 federal minimum wage included in the House-passed costs considering that it was ruled by the Senates parliamentarian as outside the scope of the chambers rules of spending plan reconciliation.Some House liberals desire the administering officer of the Senate, possibly Vice President Kamala Harris, to just overlook the parliamentarians ruling and keep the base pay in the bill.But Durbin threw cold water on that idea, which is likewise opposed by a variety of senators in both celebrations and by the White House.” I dont think thats going to work,” Durbin said. “I hope we think really seriously about dealing with the minimum wage in a various place.” Yet pursuing the wage trek outside of budget reconciliation would require 60 votes to get rid of a GOP filibuster, something extremely unlikely to succeed.Given the divisions within the Senate Democratic Caucus over the $15 hourly wage mandate, Durbin conceded that the parliamentarians decision made passage of the overall costs “less complicating,” while calling the ruling “disappointing.”.