Busting coronavirus myths found on social media – The Salt Lake Tribune – Salt Lake Tribune

How you believe Sweden carried out is extremely based on which country you compare them to. If you compare them to the U.S., Spain, Italy or the U.K., Sweden looks better. , if you compare them to Nordic next-door neighbors Finland, Norway, and Denmark– which went through lockdowns– things look a lot even worse.

Sweden garnered a great deal of attention for its uncommon approach to the coronavirus. Instead of locking whatever down, Sweden made just a few legal changes– closing schools for those 16 and older, turning all dining establishments and bars to table service, banning retirement home check outs, and prohibiting gatherings over 50 individuals.

One post being passed around today easily put a great deal of these misconceptions in one place. Its tough to know where this list initially came from– I found it on Facebook from Afshine Emrani, a right-wing doctor in Los Angeles, in addition to on the Instagram of Ben Tapper, a conservative chiropractor in Omaha. Still, its been shared thousands of times in different screenshots.


Looking at these charts, its hard to argue Sweden “was ideal.” I imply, sure, their pandemic results were better than what weve seen in the United States, but weve made numerous errors. Swedens stats are substantially worse than Finland, Norway, and even Germany– consisting of a boost in deaths by an aspect of 10. If were going to state any nations were right, those would be ones to point to. If somebody is thrilled about what Sweden has actually done throughout the pandemic, theyre trying to offer you something.

Everything else was accomplished through public info campaigns and a high social safeguard. Half of all Swedes began working from home and 93% of those over 70 years old stated they followed public health guidelines asking that they see fewer individuals. And in Sweden, staff members receive an automatic 80% of their income on days they miss work while sick, for approximately 14 days.

Lets go through each of the 12 points on the list, and separate fact from fiction.

I d like to say that the quantity of misinformation out there is “shocking,” however, well … if youre still shocked by false information in 2020, you have not been focusing.

Youve most likely seen some of these coronavirus myths on social networks, or possibly youve heard them from friends or family members.

2. Are 95% of infected individuals asymptomatic?

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention circumstances have actually estimated anywhere between 10% to 70% of infections are asymptomatic. Their present finest estimate is 40%. Its definitely not 95%. Thats just crazy talk.

3. Do asymptomatic people rarely contaminate others?

Pre-symptomatic people are really contagious. Those CDC situations have prepared for anywhere in between 30% to 70% of all transmission occurring from pre-symptomatic people, with a finest guess of 50%.

It depends on your meaning of “hardly ever.” I d still be fretted about hanging out with an asymptomatic person, personally.

That WHO analysis found that asymptomatic people are about 35% as infectious as everyone else with COVID-19– simply put, substantially lower. The CDC scenarios have approximated anywhere from 25% to 100%, though say their current finest price quote is 75%.

Keep in mind: theres a distinction in between asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic. Asymptomatic individuals never see symptoms, whereas pre-symptomatic individuals do eventually. And at any provided time, we do not know whether someone without signs is asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic.

4. Is herd resistance genuine at 20%?

Were not close to that. A Stanford research study released recently discovered that 9% of individuals in America have been contaminated with the coronavirus. Pick your favorite herd immunity rate: 20%, 46.3%, 60%. Any of them are well off in the future.

The CDCs quotes of R0 for the coronavirus have actually varied between 2 and 4, and 2.5 is considered their best price quote. That indicates we d need between 50% and 75% of the population contracting the infection to “reach herd immunity,” with 60% being the very best price quote. And of course, thats if we not did anything else differently– no social distancing, tens of thousands of people at sporting occasions, and so on

Usually, if you wish to compute at what point herd resistance alone will turn coronavirus development into coronavirus decrease, you require to concentrate on the preliminary transmission rate, our old good friend R0. Thats the average variety of people a sick person contaminates.

. Now, there are scientists who argue that the percentage is still too high. Due to the fact that some people are more social than others, for instance, one study suggested a herd resistance threshold of 46.3%. Sure.

5. and 6. Are 80% of people immune currently? Do lots of people have T-cell immunity from other coronaviruses?

T-cell responses arent perfect– they normally dont avoid you from contracting the illness because T-cells act to eliminate currently infected cells. In particular, its even likely and very possible that some of those who have coronavirus T-cells are still contagious.

Those with the best T-cells tend to have more moderate signs and a less severe illness. Which is terrific news!

This point does reference a truly favorable finding: many individuals do have T-cell reactivity to this coronavirus, meaning a piece of their immune system kicks into equipment due to the fact that this infection is in some methods similar to past ones. The BMJ took a look at six studies that reported in between 20% to 50% of people have T-cell actions to COVID-19 regardless of never ever having had it.

Lots of individuals do have useful coronavirus T-cells. Its not likely that these mean full resistance, and 80% is extremely too high of an estimate for those who are fully or partially immune.

7. Do the variety of cases matter? Or just hospitalization and death?

People getting ill is bad, even if they do not go to the healthcare facility. Sick people frequently cant go to work, which is bad for their household and their economy.

However cases likewise matter in terms of future growth– each case represents a person who can spread the infection to other individuals. The more individuals who are possible spreaders, the more spread is likely to happen.

I imply, obviously cases matter.

Modifications in screening can have huge impacts on the number of cases we discover out about. Whenever weve seen a boost in cases, weve seen a boost in hospitalizations, and then a few weeks later, an increase in deaths. Are cases a prominent indication of hospitalizations and death?

I cant think I needed to lose two paragraphs explaining to two social media doctors that illness is bad.

8. Does an increase in cases at the end of a pandemic lead to increased deaths and hospitalizations?

Yes. Heres Utahs data, simply since its the dataset Im most acquainted with.

Cases went up. Deaths came about two to 3 weeks later.

The concept that the end of the pandemic (and lets hope we are nearing the end of the pandemic) indicates that cases somehow do not cause hospitalizations and deaths just doesnt make sense.

9. Do lockdowns harm individuals and increase deaths by exacerbating other health problems?

Do the secondary results harm more than the disease itself? Its unclear.

In terms of death, not. In America, were at about 285,000 excess deaths throughout the pandemic, and about 210,000 of those are COVID-19 deaths. While more will pass away from COVID-19 moving forward, secondary deaths will increase too– individuals will pass away from cancers or other long-term illnesses they didnt learn about due to the pandemic.

How do millions of COVID-19 diseases compare to the impact of millions of children missing out on school? Perhaps a viewpoint degree would be most valuable.

But yes, lockdowns have unfavorable secondary results, and its hard to know whether the main COVID-19 goals attained deserve it.

10. Is reinfection really, very unusual?

Still, I d say that this point is precise, up until now.

However, we might see more reinfection cases in the months and years to come, as antibodies to the virus break down with time. One study found that antibody amounts fall by about 50% after three months, but even the percentage of antibodies that stay should offer quite great defense. After a year or multiple years, we dont understand.

11. For a lot of individuals of working age, is the coronavirus like the flu?

This is also a statement that President Donald Trump tweeted Tuesday early morning: that the coronavirus was like the flu for most.

Here are several quotes for the fatality ratio of coronavirus vs. the CDC estimates of the death ratio of influenza over numerous years, when changed for age:

If you take a look at other non-death metrics– hospitalization percentage, variety of symptoms, length of symptoms– you find the same thing: on average, COVID-19 is significantly worse than the flu. Part of this is since we have numerous vaccines and treatments for the flu, however few for the coronavirus.

Keep in mind that the above graph has a logarithmic scale, in this case, each dash is 10 times greater than the one below it. And you can see, there are considerable differences in between the death rate of influenza and coronavirus for anybody 20 or over. For younger grownups, COVID-19 has to do with 2 to 5 times more fatal, and for older adults, its 10 to 15 times more fatal.

Estimates of COVID-19 IFR vs. influenza IFR.

12. Are kids immune from COVID-19?

Lets be clear, its obvious that the rates of extreme illness and death from COVID-19 are significantly lowered in kids. Those portions are better than their adult equivalents. And there is some idea that an active thymus, where we find T-cells, might be part of the protective circumstances included.

The desire of people to both share and believe this misinformation is dissuading, due to the fact that the battle versus COVID-19 has to be a cumulative one. If a big share of the population takes various action since they think one or all of these lies, it injures all of society, not simply themselves.

Andy Larsen is an information columnist who is focusing on the coronavirus. He is likewise among The Salt Lake Tribunes Utah Jazz beat writers. You can reach him at

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention circumstances have estimated anywhere in between 10% to 70% of infections are asymptomatic. That implies we d require between 50% and 75% of the population contracting the infection to “reach herd resistance,” with 60% being the finest estimate. Due to the fact that some people are more social than others, for example, one research study recommended a herd resistance limit of 46.3%. A Stanford research study released last week found that 9% of people in America have been contaminated with the coronavirus. Pick your preferred herd resistance rate: 20%, 46.3%, 60%.

So yes, as Jonathan Swift said, “Falsehood flies, and the truth comes limping after it.” However if we shoot those frauds down, the truth is all that still can move forward.

Even among those who werent hospitalized, 58% of school-aged kids with validated coronavirus reported at least one sign.

From March 1 to Sept. 19, there were 277,285 children validated to have the coronavirus in the United States, according to the CDCs study. Just over 1% of those were hospitalized (3,240 kids), while 404 of them went to an extensive care system and 51 of them died.

Yes, kids get ill from COVID-19. They are not immune.